ATLAS TYRES LIMITED, SHEIKHUPURA versus ATLAS TYRES LIMITED EMPLOYEES\' UNION (C.B.A.), SHEIKHUPURA
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 38 and 22A (10) (11) and (12) proceedings before the Labor Court set up by the Labor Union (CBA) to make a referendum on the establishment by the Labor Court. The previous proceedings against the employer establishment were directed to execute the referendum within one month, and the application for immunity was not taken off the record. Gone, the unknown decision will cause some doubt about this fact. Establishment was made to affect the service by the Labor Court, but the process server did not receive any notice that the Establishment was abstaining from the services, which would generally be considered valid, unless affected and the pre-order. Do not intend to isolate or request action against it. The server where the National Industrial Relations Commission learned of unfair labor practice (as in the present case) will not exclude the Labor Court's jurisdiction to entertain unfair labor matters, even when the National Industrial Relations Commission If a case of unfair labor practice is pending before the Labor Court, the Labor Court will refrain from dealing with the same appeal against the former class. Sacked for not having guaranteed action, the establishment was instructed to take steps to start the referendum exercise.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Shahdad Pur lawyer