Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, RAWALPINDI AND 2 OTHERS

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 204, 15 and 16 of the Supreme Court Act (LXIV of 1976), Section 3 Police Act (V 1868), Section 31 and 33A (a) (d) (h) (m) West Pakistan Motor Vehicle Ordinance ( XIX of 1965), Section 78 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 133 and 144 Tee Court Contempt of Court to withhold Road Ounce Senior officers of the district administration namely, District Magistrate, Deputy Inspector General of Police and Senior Superintendent of Police (Senior Superintendent of Police). Respondents) justified the blockade by stating that the road was blocked by heavy stones, concrete beams and containers placed from one end of the road to the other, and such ones B had failed to exclude donors. Under the control of the district administration, this responsibility and the resulting blockade of this road would have been informed, that the High Court was a process for those wishing to stop and refuse the aforesaid road. The calculation was meant to disrupt the work of the High Court and frustrate the administration of justice even if the respondents had no such intention, their action is included under the definition of "contempt" as such. That is listed in Section 3. He was convicted of contempt of court Act, 1976 and his conviction, however, since his purpose was to eradicate the greatness of the law and the dignity of the court, each of the three claimants was fined only Rs 100. Being the victim of a default one day section property advocate from Jamshoro lawyer