BASSAR versus HAWA
Article 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, the determination of constitutional jurisdiction and the jurisdiction of the Family Court High Court jurisdiction to interfere with the tribunal's decisions in exercising its constitutional jurisdiction. Subject to the terms of the That the tribunal should have no jurisdiction or be occupied. That the tribunal should have crossed the authority to decide the case, or that he had decided the case if there was no evidence, the trial court decided the case on the material brought on record by both parties. The conclusions were drawn on the basis of the court's repeated efforts to bring reconciliation between the parties that failed. According to the evidence, that they could not live together in the boundaries of God because of deep rooted hatred between them, the order to dissolve the marriage after examining the whole evidence and paying a certain amount of money to the wife. It was later approved by the trial court. No legal jurisdiction and no law in the court and no order to be sustained; no interference in the circumstances was guaranteed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Loralai lawyer