MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, STORE AND WORKSHOP DIVISION, MANDI BAHAUDDIN
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25 A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Sections 1 (4) and 5 0 12 Termination of Service Re-Elementary Employees Initially Temporary Was recruited as Working three months and manuals against permanent positions, his posts did not go unnoticed during nine months and he served continuously for many years, without any interruption in the service of employees mechanically and unjustly. They show notices or charge sheets because of the termination of a service and never had to face an inquiry before their service was terminated, though it was never told that employees were required to perform a particular project or Was hired to perform a specific task of a particular task, although initially three months He was employed for many years, but continued his work for more than nine months against permanent positions. He gained permanent staff status, thus terminating employees without strict adherence to relevant provisions of the law. Could terminate the employees' services, without issuing notices or charge sheets, and without having to inquire against them. Employees were ordered to attend the service again
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Murree lawyer