Find a Lawyer

FAZAL AHMAD versus RIAZ-UR-RAHIM

Article 42 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 115 The plaintiff's claim that the variable in question was illegal, fraudulent and hereditary was excluded First Appellate Court correctly noted that the parties to the determination The real question was whether the plaintiffs succeeded? In proving that they were the legal heirs of the defendant who, after scanning both the trial court and oral and documentary evidence before the first appeals court of his prediction, came to the conclusion that the plaintiff failed to prove this important point. Such a finding of truth does not require the intervention of a confirmed jurisdiction. Thus, the plaintiffs were not entitled to relief famous lower court advocate from Chiniot lawyer