Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM SHEIK versus THE STATE

In the series of banks (Special Courts) Ordinances in 1984 (Special Courts) Ordinances (IX of 1984; Section 6 and second schedule, review the evidence of evidence prosecutors that had no intention of falsifying the accused. The matter and whose credibility could not be imposed on cross-examination had completely involved him in the commission of the crime, after allegations that he had detected fraud to defraud himself. Not only did he voluntarily confess his crime before his officers but also wrote a letter. He has never denied that he verbally misappropriated the amounts in question and that through trial of the documents under the evidence, the accused were legally subject to the provisions of section 6 and other penalties in respect of banks. The Special Courts (Ordinance, 1984) convicted and the accused convicted were retained best law firm from Layyah lawyer