Find a Lawyer

M.Y. MALIK & COMPANY versus SPLENDOURS INTERNATIONAL

Code of Conduct 1908 Section 474 of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (2) (d) Appeal directly to the Supreme Court's jurisdiction over which the execution is more than Rs. 50,000 and the execution court has attached the property and An arrest warrant has been issued. In the execution of a decision, the debtor's creditors, in front of the High Court, had challenged the creditors' decision to pay what money the debtor had paid under the decree. The question was whether the question would be settled by implementing a special court under Section 47, before the CPC, the execution court could not determine such questions, the persons responsible for the decision were the High Court. The matter was reviewed and the effect of the judgment passed by the High Court was that the judgment was subject to the judgment of the impugned order. Stated responsibility, which ultimately was standing commitment is no longer any room for the court process. In order to go into these questions, the court, thus, could not pass the final order in the proceedings, determining July's liability. This question has been decided by the High Court and its execution. The article has been set which applies to more than 50,000, direct appeal before the Supreme Court in the circumstances famous lower court advocate from Eminabad lawyer