GHULAM SABIR ANSARI versus RETURNING OFFICER
Section 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 2, 63 and 18513 representing the People's Act 1976, the applicant's nomination papers for the seat of the Provincial Assembly mention all their properties along with the plots in their list of assets. Is denied Applicants will be appealed by the Election Tribunal as well as their constitutional application for leave to be allowed by the High Court, considering that Section 12 (2) (iii) and ( iv) the Public Representation Act, 1976; whether the petitioner's papers by the Returning Officer were based on the misrepresentation of the material on record; whether the Election Tribunal petition: On this basis excludes the applicant's appeal. Was not emphasized or favored with the Returning Officer: whether the High Court was justified in holding the petition that Amin And one was not disclosed all of their property without naming the property, which was allegedly pressed the applicants and without providing the opportunity to reject it again. And whether the facts of this case are guaranteed by the Returning Officer / Election Commission of the Supreme Court, the applicant was instructed to allow the parties to participate in the selection of the constituency without prejudice as a result of the killings and appeals of the parties. Was.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Lawrence pur lawyer