Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

RIFAT ASKARI versus THE STATE


Accountability Ordinance 1996 Article 12 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 409, 420, 468, 471 and 109 of the Corruption Act (11 of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Accountability Ordinance (XXI of 1996), ex. The case was registered under 5409/420/468/471/109 against the accused, the PPC read with section 5 (2), the Investigation Agency Report of Corruption Prevention Act 1947 , Was presented under CR and in the meantime the Accountability Ordinance 1996 came into force and the matter was forwarded to the Chief Accountability Commissioner and the case was forwarded to trial under the Ordinance Validity Act or even in 1986 He was not guilty of a mistake when committing the crime and the facts were not the same one. In the Accountability Ordinance, no penalty nor penalty was imposed in 1996, Article 12 (1) (a) of the Constitution of Pakistan was not drawn under the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Quaidabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.