Find a Lawyer

TARIQ JAVED versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, F.I.A., ISLAMABAD

Constitution of Pakistan 3 Article3 199 Article Writing 199 199 qu Article was issued in response to the advertisement of the recruitment of sub-inspectors to the Federal Investigating Respondents, who were already working as Assistant Sub Inspectors, for all the posts of Sub Inspectors. Respondents failed the test / interview. After nearly twelve years of recruiting exams / interviews for sub-inspectors in which defendants failed, a committee headed by the Federal Investigation Agency's Additional Director-General announced that in the exam that took place twelve years ago, the defendants had failed, The marking of the papers was an irresistible force, with the statement of the committee represented by the defendants and they were appointed sub-inspectors with no prior effect, irrespective of their qualifications in relation to their educational qualifications. , The applicants in their constitutional petitions challenged such appointment of the respondents. It was appropriate for the RS to issue a writ of warrant, which was quite different and different from the appeal provided to the service tribunal under the Treatment Tribunals Act 1973, the only requirement / condition for the issuance of a writ of warrant was: That it was to be set on the record. A public office was illegally occupied by a person without the approval of the law; in that case, the defendant, who has been in clear violation of the law and rules, has been employed as a sub-inspector for more than fourteen years. Was included despite the fact that they had previously failed. The High Court approved the petition, declaring that the appointment of the respondents as sub-inspector without any legal authority top civil advocates from Chowk Munda lawyer