Find a Lawyer

S.MASOOD ALI versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, BUREAU OF EMIGRATION AND OVERSEAS EMPLOYMENT, ISLAMABAD

Claims 8 and 9 of the Civil Servants Act 1973 and Tribunals Act of 1973 (LXX of 1973), Section 4 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) claiming the promotion of senior employees / respondents of public servants to B17. Is. Development respondents, on the preliminary temporary sanitary list, were found to be inferior to applicants after which they submitted representation against a list which is still pending before the Department Authority when the respondent Appeal filed before the Service Tribunal which was dismissed as being prohibited under SA (1). B) the Supreme Court of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, refused to relieve the applicants for respondent's leave of appeal, in the subsequent proceedings the Tribunal was declared non-official by the department authority, but not only the official Employees found ineligible and ineligible to promote the respondent's preference for not having B 16 posts permanently in B 17, but also that respondents were left alone on a regular basis in B16. Therefore, he was entitled to the post of B17 Government employees claimed that the parties in the matter in the matter between the parties. N between already decided during the litigation. Since there was no fresh order in the field, the appeal before the Service Tribunal for leave of appeal was not only banned as Race Judeta, but also the entertainment department's representation and appeal by the Supreme Court. The respondent's request for leave was not made after removal. The disappointment was timely banned. And that service Tribo law websites from Kamber Ali Khan lawyer