Find a Lawyer

NASEER AHMAD versus GENERAL MANAGER, QUALITY TEXTILE MILLS

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3) Prior decision against industrial concern Due to the presence of the presence of its professionals, the industrial concern filed an application to keep the earlier decision within the bounds, which the employees promptly rejected. Filed a complaint against the officers of the mill. After he resumed duty and withheld his liability, the workman also prayed that arrest warrants be issued against the mill officials and they should be punished and each was sentenced to one year in prison. Mann filed his response to an industrial concern request to set aside the ex parte order, requesting the dismissal of the request for restoration / review, with a notice to the labor representative requesting his prior decision. The proceedings should be suspended and the representative organization of the representative worker should be adopted in a logical manner and by a competent court ANNONAY be resorted to unique ways of dealing with deviations. Properly, at the appropriate time, the doctor was able to raise the aggrieved worker in the review forum, although only two days were left when he could easily and efficiently raise the same request in the lower forum. It cost a lot of extra labor and heavy labor, because the Labor Court didn't. In reviewing its earlier ruling, the court was not deprived of the authority to issue a ruling on the dissolution of justice, which would have served against the Labor Court order (under which it requested an industrial concern). But was temporarily halted in the implementation process). Condemnable and registration advocate from Mian Chunnu lawyer