Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus GENERAL MANAGER, COORDINATION

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 2 (i) and Section O13 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request for Employee Services of an Employee The dismissal of the employee's complaint request was dismissed because of an industry concern that he was serving, the Labor Court and the Labor Appellate Tribunal rejected, on the ground that he was acting as a store officer. The employee was not a worker, therefore, he could not do so. The store officer had formed an officer association on which A complaint petition was filed after the promotion. After the formation of such an association, he disconnected from the labor union for all practical purposes, as he could not work with the worker as well as the officer. He said that in his cross-examination of the Establishment Employee, it was acknowledged that the officers 'association includes officers' exercise. Such entry of the administration into the administration clearly indicates that being the general secretary of the officers association. , They cannot claim to be employed in the basic duty of the Industrial Establishment employee after the development works because the officer was a caretaker in nature. The employee admitted in his cross-examination that certain staff of assistants and clerks were working under him, Thus, the job was supervised in nature and in academic work, if any If there was, it was the event that it can not be brought within the definition of trade him. West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 registration advocate from Kahuta lawyer