Section 7 of the Code of Conduct of the Defendant challenged the trial court's order, under which the Medical Board rejected the request to submit an invoice under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000 that, at the time of the investigation of the accused, He was 18 to 19 years old, to take advantage of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, the accused had to take up the matter at the investigative stage, and later the case was before the trial court before the trial court. Was raised, which required action. In section 7 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, the trial court will inquire into the matter to determine the age of the accused, and the medical report will be part of this inquiry, with no conclusive evidence of the evidence raised by the defendant. Will be headed. During the investigation by the accused by law. In which to provide ample opportunity for interim scrutiny of witnesses to test the credibility of the litigation and documents and the credibility of the oral evidence, the opinion of the Medical Board would be one piece of this and not conclusive and conclusive evidence of the minority accused. Evidence will also be directed to determine the age of, if it was also objected to by the prosecutor, he may request the author to cross-inspect the report while dismissing the application as directed by the High Court. That the accused was involved in the case. While pressing on his application for his minority, he can also affirm this before the trial court in light of the guidelines provided by the High Court.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
