Find a Lawyer

FAIZ AND SONS versus HAKIMSONS IMPEX (PVT.) LTD.

The default in the payment of rent is the Sindh Tenant Premise Ordinance 1979 Sections 5 (1) and 15 (2) (ii) the first landlord filed for eviction on the basis of default in payment of rent, but excluding The petitioners had entered into a new tenancy. The agreement under which the rent of the house was increased, in view of the new agreement, the application for the previous expenditure was withdrawn while the tenant despite the implementation of the new tenancy agreement, the increased rent for the premises as per the new tenancy agreement. Failed to pay and instead challenged the validity of a new tenancy agreement which he did not. Binding to the parties as it was neither registered nor signed and endorsed by the Tenant Controller, Civil Judge or Magistrate as per Section 5 (1) of Section 5 of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance, 1979. Was provided and the tenant dispute was canceled in view of the fact. (1) Sindh was merely a directory of Section 5 of the Rated Premises Ordinance, in which case no penalty was provided. The non-compliant tenant had already pledged to pay the rent for non-payment of the premises as per the new tenancy agreement and was ordered to be evicted right on the land by the rent controller. online advocate from Hassan Abdal lawyer