MUHAMMAD SHAFI KHAN versus PAK SUZUKI MOTORS LTD., KARACHI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section 38 (3A) and 51 back benefits Claims for employees who were reinstated with back benefits and recovered benefits, claiming that the back benefits granted to them were insufficient. Because there were no other benefits. In his application, wages such as conveyance allowance, house rent, attendance allowance, washing allowance and medical allowance have claimed the collection of scholarships, such as claims for dismissal, by the Labor Court. Did not rule out a claim for a valid term. The matter was known, and thus the employee's claim was rightly rejected by the Labor Court, which could not interfere with the tribunal's amended jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Miran Shah lawyer
