PHOENIX SECURITY SERVICE LABOUR UNION REGISTERED AND C.B.A UNDER I.R.O ,1969 versus PHOENIX SECURITY SERVICE (PVT.) LTD.
Articles 26 (3), 27, 33 and 43 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Raising the Industrial Dispute 6 In relation to the terms and conditions of service, six demands submitted by the Collective Bargaining Agent were not accepted by the employer, collectively. The bargaining agent was given a strike notice and also gave notice to the employer and the peacekeeper that the matter failed to decide, both the employer and the collector bargaining agent went into the merits of the case or recorded the evidence to dismiss the evidence. The Labor Court raised the issue before the Labor Court, saying that the industrial dispute was not raised As with the nun, the original demand or collective bargaining agent complaint had six demands but another demand was added but after the seventh demand remained the same and change, the result was one for relief. And other than demand, not all will be rendered. Other demands would be illegal and would not invalidate the entire manufacturer. The dispute raised by the Labor Court order was approved by the collective bargaining agent for no reason, was kept separate, and for investigation of the industrial dispute. Further remand of this case was obtained for.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer