Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AJAIB versus PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Rules Rules 3, 4, 10 and 15 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission Regulation, Rules, 4, 10 and 15 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court (Code of Conduct), 1984, R38 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), section 42 As a result of the interview by the Post Hospital Pharmacist Public Service Commission, the respondent proposed for appointment against the appellant in such a post that requested the appellant's constitutional request to demand that the respondents' favor Public Service Commission recommendation was invalid, excluded in boundaries Consider the document associated with the constitutional application under which the Public Service Commission certified Refused to issue copies, which was the best evidence available to the appellant, the Public Service Commission denied the appellant's request on the basis that the commission's action was not available because of the confidential record of such proceedings. May be. The High Court's expulsion to bring such documents to the candidate / appellant resulted in failure of justice. The High Court also failed to take notice that the affidavit was filed in support of the legal proceedings. It was alleged that the Public Service Commission had illegally given additional numbers to the defendants and thus successfully deprived the appellant. Such an affidavit in support of the appellant's claim in the interview was legal evidence in terms of R 38 38, Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court (Code of Conduct), in 1984 of, and the absence of a respondent's affidavit. This could not be eliminated by the legal point of view. The constitutional petition raised the question as to whether the Public Service Commission was awarded the M.F. pakistani advocates South Wazirstan lawyer