Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

STATE versus AFTAB AHMED KHAN SHERPAO


Azad Jammu and Kashmir Board of Revenue Act, 1993 Section 8 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), reviewing the decision by ratification order of the 44th Board of Revenue Scope, passed by the Member Board of Revenue, As it was outside the scope of the review, in its review order given in Section 8, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Board of Revenue Act 1993, the Board of Revenue had practically re-appealed and decided the points to be considered. And it was decided by the board of its predecessor. There is no jurisdiction to review any jurisdiction based on a false doctrine because it cannot hear an appeal against its own judgment / decision or decision of its predecessor, especially when no error has been disclosed. If so, the case could not be reopened. As such, there was no illegal and no legal effect. The first order of the Board of Revenue, under which the certificate passed by the assistant collector, was restored.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Laliah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.