Find a Lawyer

STATE versus AFTAB AHMED KHAN SHERPAO

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Board of Revenue Act, 1993 Section 8 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), reviewing the decision by ratification order of the 44th Board of Revenue Scope, passed by the Member Board of Revenue, As it was outside the scope of the review, in its review order given in Section 8, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Board of Revenue Act 1993, the Board of Revenue had practically re-appealed and decided the points to be considered. And it was decided by the board of its predecessor. There is no jurisdiction to review any jurisdiction based on a false doctrine because it cannot hear an appeal against its own judgment / decision or decision of its predecessor, especially when no error has been disclosed. If so, the case could not be reopened. As such, there was no illegal and no legal effect. The first order of the Board of Revenue, under which the certificate passed by the assistant collector, was restored. jobs for fresh advocates from Jehangira lawyer