Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL JALIL KHAN versus STATE


Section 60 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for the seizure of land by the plaintiff of the Court of Appeal under the Efficiency suit and the execution of this order dismissed by the Court of Appeal. The petition was filed while the defendants objected to the execution but were not acted upon. The plaintiff's review was also excluded. The court acting on the validity had the jurisdiction to pass the order as acknowledged and could be challenged by filing a review. The review was rejected by the relevant court, thus, the impugned orders passed by the executing court. Was not even eligible for. As the review court cannot, without any imagination, consider it unlawful or without legal authority, the injunctions ordered are neither obedient nor perverse, therefore, in their extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction. The use does not guarantee any interference by the High Court which can only be taken. Used in exceptional circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate for immigration from Shahdad Kot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.