REHMAN versus STATE
Provision of Indictment against Tenants (Tenants) against the Petitions of the Provincial Border Tenancy Act, 1950, 24 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Sections 172 and 53 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution. Has been verified for. Claimed that they had acquired proprietary rights in relation to the land acquired, but with the consolidation of the income-taxing staff, the respondents had instituted a case for fraudulently recovering the taxes and subsequently for the purpose of recovering the revenue. A case was set up that was finalized. The judicial candidates also filed a constitutional petition against the decision on the reinforcement of taxes, which the courts approved as the taxation requirement was not illegal because a constitutional petition could be filed against such orders with legal authority, Appropriate / alternative treatment was available to applicants. And they admitted, at the same time, that by filing a case in relation to the declaration of their title, which was still pending the decision in the civil court of the competent jurisdiction, the constitutional petition filed by the petitioners was not only serious. But also of a substance that could not be sustained under conditions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Head Marala lawyer