NAEEMHUSSAIN CHATTHA versus TAWAKKAL ULLAH
Sections 4 & Election 63 Election Request The effect of non-participation of the party required in the election application will be the disqualification of the required party to dismiss the election petition, the provisions contained in Articles 4 and 63 are mandatory in nature and not just the directory. The result of the selection of the candidate who participated in the election petition. The dismissal wherein the contesting candidate was included in the preliminary phase and then his name was removed for the applicant's instance, Section 4 Representative, the Representative People Act, 1976 clause. Was not complied with and was required to exclude the election petition. The Election Tribunal had deleted the name of the contesting candidate on the petitioner's request and did not. The cancellation of the names of the respondents was not the fault of the Election Tribunal but the applicant would have erred in the view that the provisions of Sections 54 and 63 of the Act were in the knowledge of the applicant and that even if he had applied for the Election. Before deleting the name of any of the competing candidates in the tribunal, he was responsible for the results; the retired candidate was not obliged to point out to the tribunal that such applicant's action was to exclude his election request. Will
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer