Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD SALEEM SADDOZAI versus CAHAIRMN, P.O.F., WAH


Mandatory Services Armed Forces Ordinance 1971 Section 9 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Claims of Government Employees' Sanctity of the Employee's Response to Sanctions Beans C Was Not Accepted During the Service Tribunal Authentication Seeking leave for employees' appeal, it was claimed that Section 9A, Armed Forces Ordinance, 1971 mandatory service only applies to employment under the federal and provincial governments and does not apply to services under the Establishment. Which is neither a subsidiary service of the federal government nor a provincial government dispute by the applicants. So. Appellate leave was granted to examine the dispute raised by the applicant

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Bagh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.