MUHAMMAD SALEEM SADDOZAI versus CAHAIRMN, P.O.F., WAH
Mandatory Services Armed Forces Ordinance 1971 Section 9 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Claims of Government Employees' Sanctity of the Employee's Response to Sanctions Beans C Was Not Accepted During the Service Tribunal Authentication Seeking leave for employees' appeal, it was claimed that Section 9A, Armed Forces Ordinance, 1971 mandatory service only applies to employment under the federal and provincial governments and does not apply to services under the Establishment. Which is neither a subsidiary service of the federal government nor a provincial government dispute by the applicants. So. Appellate leave was granted to examine the dispute raised by the applicant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Bagh lawyer