Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SALEEM SADDOZAI versus CAHAIRMN, P.O.F., WAH


Mandatory Services Armed Forces Ordinance 1971 Section 9 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Claims of Government Employees' Sanctity of the Employee's Response to Sanctions Beans C Was Not Accepted During the Service Tribunal Authentication Seeking leave for employees' appeal, it was claimed that Section 9A, Armed Forces Ordinance, 1971 mandatory service only applies to employment under the federal and provincial governments and does not apply to services under the Establishment. Which is neither a subsidiary service of the federal government nor a provincial government dispute by the applicants. So. Appellate leave was granted to examine the dispute raised by the applicant

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Dadu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.