SECRETARY, NARCOTICS CONTROL DIVISION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD versus MUHAMMAD SAJJAD
Articles 8 and 9 of the Civil Servants Act 1973 Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) seniority public servants were not promoted while their juniors were promoted Service Tribunal appealed the departments' appeal to the government employees. Instructed them to review their cases. And approve the appropriate orders. The Validity Petitioners (authorities) held that the service tribunal had no jurisdiction in determining the fitness of public servants and that such a question was brought to the notice of the Public Promotion Committee, which resulted in Government employees are eligible for development but they were not. Reasonable and concrete reasons for disqualification of public servants were not given, nor were their annual intelligence reports cited, nor any other material supporting their unconditional facts to the advanced public servants. I was admitted and no preferred reason was given. Justify their progress on other public servant heads After the Service Tribunal received remand from the Departmental Appellate Authority, no interference with such order was guaranteed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Swat lawyer