Find a Lawyer

FAIZ MUHAMMAD versus MEHRAB SHAH

Sections 426 and 497 of the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act 1975, Activities of Terrorism (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Sections 5A (8) and 7 Appeal Rights Sections 426 and 497, CR P.C. The question of application should not be construed as a dispute of sufficient right to appeal the suspension of sentence under Section 426 of the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975, on the release of the accused, on bail. Was. Such guarantees were not denied in the bail release by the Sections 497, CRPC, and guaranteed by the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act 1975, but especially under the pressure of terrorist activities. Was provided under Section 5 (8) of the Act. The courts), with certain differences in the circumstances of the Act, 1975, which had to be seen before the accused was released on bail, when the question of interpretation of section 497, CR and section 5A (8) ist activities related to terrorist repression Special Courts (Act, 1975) Having dealt with bail, one can make a simple interpretation of the facts of the bail, sometimes favoring the facts, and sometimes requiring circumstances as to dishonesty, No such power can be given to anyone. The right to appeal which was completely denied in one law and granted in another ask a advocate free from Gharo lawyer