Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SHEER SHAH versus THE STATE


Section 289 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 555 An Sessions Court Unlawfully Relying on the Certificate Offered Before the Trial Court Hearing a Revision Request for Increase of Sentencing Which was not part of the evidence on record. The accused had to be excluded from consideration who had already suffered the lengthy trial, he confessed to his trial before the trial court and put himself at his mercy. And as a result, they deserved to be dealt with properly, which, in any case, did not demand a maximum sentence of six months imprisonment for the crime charged. Each of them had already been sentenced to imprisonment by requesting the provisions of Section 1 561A, CRPC.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Blitang lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.