Find a Lawyer

U.B.L versus GHAFFAR AZIM KHAN

Termination Impact of Agency Contract Act 1872 Section 221 The Impact Agent had mortgaged the plaintiff with the bank from which he had borrowed the agency to do business. The agent further agreed to keep the goods in his principal's (PIA) warehouse where the principal could not be removed, and only in that case the plaintiff's signed application could be removed on the slip with which the goods were in the goods, He was held that the principal violated the terms of his contract with his agent. And after the sale of the plaintiff (which was confirmed by the principal), the mortgaged goods from the bonded warehouse without the requisition of the plaintiff, and so on, were sold to the claimant in the account kept by the claimant in accordance with the terms of the contract. Money cannot be deposited and there are reasons for the action. Despite being a plaintiff against the principal agent, though the promise was denied and the execution of other documents, he had not yet denied his signature on the agent's failure to support his claim. Failing to present evidence that he did not execute the questions under the documents, raise the view that he did not raise such documents, especially when he was in the field of these documents in his The signatures were not denied to the agents for conducting business for both of these principals. Principal or agent responsible to pay certain amount of such loans as well as joint and several interest when you need a advocate from Jacobabad lawyer