Find a Lawyer

PIR BUX versus GHULAM RASOOL

Special Relief Act 1877 Sections 54 and 12 Litigation Act (IX of 19013), Article 113 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O VII, R 11, Sections 98 and 0,11, R 2 Trial of Trial Rejection In the case of the trial court which was earlier for a permanent injunction on the basis of the sale agreement was also rejected, after which the plaintiff on the basis of the same agreement to sell for the specific performance of the seller's contract. While the latter was sued seven years after the date of implementation of the alleged sale agreement, Article 113, the Limitation Act, 1908, specified the specific act of the contract. The suit provides for a three-year period to file a lawsuit, so, apparently the suit was banned by the statute of limitations, raising the question of limitation will neither be exempt nor in this case the question. The exception was constant in response. The constitution and provisions cannot be exempted by mandatory claimant's suit was also banned by Rule 0 11, R 2, the CPC suit was affected by the limitations in question and not expected. It was time the trial court was correct and justified in dismissing the plaintiff's case. advocates from Tando Adam lawyer