MUHAMMAD FAIYAZ versus DIRECTOR, PROCUREMENT ARMY
Contract Act 1872 Section 73 Specific Relief Act (of 1877), Section 21 (a) Compensation for breach of contract The plaintiff does not provide evidence on the market value of the alleged short supply of goods to the plaintiff. The plaintiff's evidence of damages to the plaintiff on my record record of support, could not be accepted, because the contracted goods were neither of the exceptionally special type nor of commodities that were not available in the market, so the plaintiff was entitled to a specific performance order. The plaintiff was only entitled to compensation for the grant only the plaintiff in the equity would be entitled to proport the quantity of goods ion proportional compensation is not paid to them, at least at the rate at which they purchased the entire quantity of goods, while calculating the price at which the price was fixed in the case in which the claimant was annexed. Was ordered according to such terms. the amount
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Piplan lawyer
