Find a Lawyer

ASHFAQ AHMAD versus UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB

Chapter 1, Regulation 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The result of the BA examination of constitutional applicants was withheld with remarks - the Examiner who lost the response book of Ex two articles claims to be 60 According to Regulation 6 of the University Regulations, the average score was not verified because the relevant paper response books were received by the appropriate examiners, as well as by the examiner's results sheet. The list of awards produced was also prepared on the same basis. The award list and after that, the final result was prepared and Rule 6 was announced, therefore, the situation would not apply. Answer books were not lost until the original award list was ready. Until then the court was shown which had the marks obtained by the examiners in the presence of the original award list against each article / paper. In the second paper (in which it got 33 out of 100 marks), the examiners referred to obtaining an average score of 60%, to the extent of the specified paper (in which the examiner had obtained a score of 100). Was accepted to the extent of. The weight tester can be allowed to make a choice in this way and after the examiner's result is announced on the basis of the original award list, he claims an average of 60 60% marks in a specific paper by Regln 6. Was not entitled to do. The university calendar, which was not applicable even in the circumstances of his case family advocate from Phalia lawyer