I. T. A. NO. 107/KB OF 1987-88 versus I. T. A. NO. 107/KB OF 1987-88
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 156, 34 and 35 Error Correction Damage Forward Damage In fact, the Assessment Order allowed the Income Tax Officer to proceed without any loss, but later when the assessee himself identified the error. , Order Section 156, was amended under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Assisi. On the one hand, he himself took advantage of section 156 of the ordinance but on the other hand, in the appeal, claiming that section 156 was not applicable, it meant that when the income tax officer on similar facts removed the error under the same section. Then it was reviewed. Further with this objection, the rule, approval and reprobate of the estoppel will be assessed in the case of the Essex because if it were applied at a later stage it could not be applied because no one would benefit from a misinterpretation of the law. No lift will be allowed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Peshawar lawyer