Find a Lawyer

N.-W.F.P, versus ABDUL NASIM KHAN, B.E. (CIVIL), XEN, HIGHWAY PROTECT DIVISION, PESHAWAR

Servant Employees (Appointments, Promotions and Exchanges) Rules 1989 R 17 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Seniority Remarks Government employee was not found to be able to develop on the basis of his record. Which was not found. The development of the BPS 18 would have been good enough to guarantee a smooth qualifying payday, when its juniors were promoted to a service tribunal while accepting appeals from public servants to list inappropriate seniority. Was separated and assigned to maintain her senior seniority in the lower grade / grade. The Correctional Service Tribunal took note of the entry of a Government Representative, saying that a civil servant was classified as "good" but the Remarks / Officer of the countersigning officer did not impress me - the pen was under the picture. There was such a clear contradiction between the rating and the pen image. Under the principles of recording a pen image it is sufficiently justified by the service tribunal to pinpoint the image of the pen. The box in question was very ambiguous for a government employee's career-to-career ratio, especially when it was considered in the context of easing the length of service for promotion and obviously his duties. There was no nexus with the execution that explicitly commented on the question as a civil servant and not on the basis of which the selection board was found to be ineligible for its development, Appeal for leave of appeal Appeal leave was denied without qualification. law firms from Haripur lawyer