Find a Lawyer

SHEIKH LIAQUAT HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 523 and 561A General Clauses Act (X of 1897), Section 21 Order made under section 523 (2) of the applicant canceling the petition, CCP Supergianma The magistrate was instructed by the District Health Officer in 1996 to return the hides and skins on the order that he was dismissed with instructions to remove or dispose of the hides hidden in the garbage pile. There was an increased risk of an outbreak due to the smell. Applicants revised the order in the Sessions Court during the hearing, after which the magistrate informed the investigating officers that the printed and skins were the property held in various FIs, amended their order, dated 19-6 1996. 23 6 1996 edited. The investigating officers were instructed to approach the trial court authorized by the Magistrate for the custody of the same law, according to the Law Sessions Court, after the date of 23 July 1996. According to the order passed on the applicant's name, dated 2 1996 1996, on the basis that the magistrate used his powers under section 21 of the General Constitution to destroy the skins and skins approved on 19-6 1996. The order was withdrawn. The Act, 1897, which, as a judicial order, was passed by the magistrate on 19 6 1996, nor could section 21 of the General Clause Act 1897 grant the magistrate the authority to review the order, nor any other law. There was a clause under which they could use it. The option to review is also otherwise requested by the petitioner, which is already pending before the Sessions Court before the Session Court, 1996, 1996. solicitors from Jhudo lawyer