ABDUL SATTAR versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Pakistan WAPDA Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1978 R 5 (v) (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Water and Power Development Authority An injustice employee had to reduce the penalty on such employee. And had to replace it at the initial stage of the pay period for a period of five years from the current employee's appeal or the correctness of the service tribunal that the Chief Engineer was his authorized authority, but the unpaid fine superintendent engineer. Was imposed. A dispute was raised before the service tribunal but leave was left to appeal, however, allowing the dispute to be considered, in which case the service tribunal had already found that the chief engineer Is eligible to be sentenced. If the nature of the allegations leveled against the employee obliged the department authorities to investigate the facts, which in the absence of the allegations could not be verified. And whether the authorities acted illegally in exchange for inquiries and thereby deprived employees of a fair and appropriate opportunity to defend themselves
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Sialkot lawyer