Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus STATE

The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) challenged the validity of the gift in the civil suit by the father for the oral gift of the land to his son Donner's daughter (the plaintiff), in which it His father said at the time that he was old and weak and that the gift change was the result of cheating and cheating by the Revenue staff with the plaintiff, the trial court appealed and the High Court. Denied, however, that the defendant, who was acquitted on the charge of dismissal of evidence, was guilty of fraud and collusion with respect to the gift. The appellate court and the High Court could not identify any serious weakness which resulted in a detailed scrutiny / scrutiny of the evidence on record. The question is whether the gift / Tamilak was the result of the change or not. Yogurt and collusion was a fact that came to the fore after a thorough scrutiny of evidence that led to the discovery of recorded courts that had not been disclosed. The record faces misinterpretation / non-recrimination of the evidence as the plaintiff was considered to be the real sister of the plaintiff and will be considered in her possession, and thus in her judgment and the High Court. There will be no limit against the order. In any case, the appeal of the leave of the Supreme Court was denied female advocates from Makli lawyer