Find a Lawyer

SIEMEN\'S -PAKISTAN- ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD., KARACHI versus SHAHZAD SALEEM

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O12 (3) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Industrial workers fired on corruption charges The Court of Labor Appellate Tribunal dismissed the petition against his dismissal, however, the definition of evidence and the contents of the record found that a professional outsider had conducted a domestic inquiry into the cash payments, so such an inquiry Holding is not considered credible and the Labor Appellate Tribunal filed a constitutional petition against the Labor Appellate Tribunal's decision. Directed the re-appointment of the members to the High Court, the juror validity charges against the workers were not proved at all, as no objectionable object was recovered from them. The appellate forum could not be reopened after an in-depth discussion of the evidence, which the Ad Labor Appellate Tribunal has rightly found that there is no evidence to show that workers justified their dismissal from employment. The High Court upheld such a finding that the dismissal order by the employer against the employees was found to be irrelevant and unlawful. The Labor Appellate Forum's directive to restore such workers was affirmed that the Labor Appellate Tribunal and the High Court in resolving disputes were fully established by the rules of justice and justice in favor of workers. The decision was implemented which was already implemented by the employer in the letter. Hence the interference of sound justice patent advocate from Kohat lawyer