Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Chip Week, Regulation 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition Petition's failure to qualify in LLB paper VI, each time the applicant got 36 out of 100 marks, Punjab University Calendar To enable the LLB to pass the exam, no action was taken by University First until Reglinto, the PU calendar provides that if an individual fails to distinguish marks on paper, he or she must pass. happens. Such an advantage was not to be given to the candidates, who, although failing by five or fewer points, appeared in the examination in some part of the applicant's history, the beneficial construction of Reglin 4, the PU University calendar. As such, it would be difficult to deny the applicant such benefit to the grant of 5 Grace Marks to each candidate, but it would be discriminatory even if such benefits were denied to the Petittee. ? Oner, who would otherwise have obtained higher marks in other papers, the applicant's position that whenever he was given 36 marks indicates that there was a mistake somewhere in which the petitioner's case was beneficial construction and equitable consideration. The High Court has ruled that the relevant provisions of Regulation 4, the PU calendar, to the extent that the candidates appearing in these candidates were not given the benefit of the five grace marks. Discrimination was not justified, and for the first time in direct conflict with everyone, Grace Marx's f Was the point. The candidates were mentioned in these situations law websites from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer