YAR MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13A bail The accused had exclusive control over the raiding house, according to the contents contained in the presence of the magistrate. That, in the first place, could not be considered a person of interest, the prosecution's charges could not be immediately dismissed and the testimony of the witnesses could not be utterly defamed or simply ignored. Because he was a policeman who was alleged to have made the statement immediately. Weapons and press reports, therefore, may not have any legal effect on the record itself, and therefore there is good reason for linking the accused to the commission of the crime, and the competitor, who proposes further investigation, Was not supported for The circumstances denied the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Nilore lawyer
