Find a Lawyer

AHMAD SHAFI versus CHAIRMAN, SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KARACHI

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 (3) (4) dismissed from job Nine job was dismissed after issuing a charge sheet and inquiring on misconduct charges. The dismissal order was set aside under. The Labor Court and the employee were re-examined at the job saying that the inquiry against them was defective because neither the watchman who had arrested the employee nor the inquiry officer had been examined by the employees for the first time. The notice was submitted at the time of the response to the notice. Allegations against the watchman who arrested him, but before the Labor Court, he did not utter a word in his affidavit in evidence against the watchman, unless it is concerned to take the first inquiry officer's examination, it seems necessary It was not because the analysis, inquiry was finally concluded and another inquiry officer and an objection report was submitted at any stage of the proceeding by the employees to proceed with the matter before the second inquiry officer. The dings were taken to the place where the first inquiry officer took the watchman and the first inquiry officer's non Left unaddressed or unchecked, so it was not fatal and, based on the material on the record, the employee was neither treated unfairly nor was the Labor Appellate Tribunal illegal, The court correctly ordered that the employee be reinstated. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kunri lawyer