Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus MUHAMMAD AFSAR

Article 52 [As applicable in Azad Jammu and Kashmir] Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), OI, R 10 The interpretation of section 42 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974) was obtained in the absence of the party required. The wind which must be owned by the government was ordered to occupy the underground land, enforce the government from the plaintiffs, exclude registration in their name and enter into favor of the plaintiff but in the absence of the required party the accused received There was no such option (which was filed in the Revenue Papers) as the owner of the land, which was the Ariani, at least to the government. Could not constitute a proprietor in the same way that the land was acquired by the Water and Power Development Authority for valuable consideration and its name was included in the Revenue Record and it was included in the suit. Would not obey the decree which was obtained in his absence, so the decision in question was a hassle as far as the parties concerned were concerned. inheritance advocates near Kohistan lawyer