Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR COUNCIL versus ABDUL RASHID


Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974 Section 42 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Appeal was granted a 19-day ban on leave for leave. Within time from the date of the acknowledgment and if the request is delayed, the delay should be terminated. In the presence of the parties' litigation lawyer, the High Court's affirmative decision was regarded as knowledge of the lawyer as the client's knowledge, in which case the limitation would begin. The decision was announced in the presence of the lawyer from the date of declaration of the decision. The basis for the delayed plea was made on the basis that the lawyer did not notify within the time the decision was announced, sufficient ground for the delay. No, in the circumstances the leave was refused

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Hub Inds Estate lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.