AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR COUNCIL versus ABDUL RASHID
Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974 Section 42 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Appeal was granted a 19-day ban on leave for leave. Within time from the date of the acknowledgment and if the request is delayed, the delay should be terminated. In the presence of the parties' litigation lawyer, the High Court's affirmative decision was regarded as knowledge of the lawyer as the client's knowledge, in which case the limitation would begin. The decision was announced in the presence of the lawyer from the date of declaration of the decision. The basis for the delayed plea was made on the basis that the lawyer did not notify within the time the decision was announced, sufficient ground for the delay. No, in the circumstances the leave was refused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Hub Inds Estate lawyer