Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MASOOD AHMAD versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER, ISLAMABAD CAPITAL TERRITORY, ISLAMABAD

Civil Servants (Appointments, Promotions and Exchanges) Rules 1973 R 3 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 212 (3) Depot The public servant was neither absorbed nor against a permanent post in the department. They were repatriated. The Parents Department government employees had directed the government employees to be included in the High Court in their constitutional petition against borrowing from the department, since already after returning home, civil solicitation of their constitutional application was also requested by the government employees. Was dismissed. Accuracy The High Court rejected the review request on the ground that the constitutional petition did not show sufficient ground for reversing the decision passed in Mauritius, so the matter is related to the terms and conditions of service, therefore, the official Employees should consult the competent forum for solutions. If any High Court had correctly found out on the return of the Civil Servant that the complainant's parent's department did not need to resolve any complaint by the High Court in the constitutional petition, the High Court There was no leave to appeal against the government employee's decision, but if advised, he could consult the competent forum. Appeal leave for reconsideration denied top civil advocates from Rajanpur lawyer