Find a Lawyer

REHMAT ULLAH versus SHAMIM AKHTAR

Sections 3 and 14 of the Pakistan Citizenship Act 1951 and XXXV of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (1964), S5 and the Scheduled Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for the plaintiff to be married on marriage as being a citizen of Jammu and Kashmir. A lawsuit has been filed for dissolution. M&A in Azad Jammu and Kashmir failed till the level of the plaintiff then he filed a lawsuit at Mansehra in the North West Frontier Province (Pakistan) and dissolved the marriage on the basis of the correct state articles. Succeeded in obtaining a decree for. Jammu and Kashmir could not be subject to dual citizenship or the state of Jammu and Kashmir and had migrated to Pakistan with the intention of staying here till that time, the relations between Pakistan and the state have not been settled. Their status as prejudice will be interpreted. , Be a citizen of Pakistan under section 14B, Pakistan Citizenship Act, 1951 Pakistan Citizenship Act, 1951, as such, will not apply. According to the parties and their Section 3 plaintiff, at the beginning of the Pakistan Citizenship Act 1951, they cannot be considered citizens of Pakistan who were under the state of Jammu and Kashmir after failing to dissolve their marriage in Azad Kashmir. ? Later on, temporary residence in Pakistan area could not be ordered to dissolve marriage from Family Court Family Court in Mansehra (Pakistan). Therefore, if the marriage between the spouses dissolves, like family suit, There was no jurisdiction to make a decision. The decisions and decrees rendered by the Family Court in Mansehra were declared with no legal authority nor any legal effect. top civil advocates from Ludhan lawyer