CHAIRMAN, SELECTION COMMITTEE/PRINCIPAL, KING EDWARD MEDICAL COLLEGE, LAHORE versus WASIF ZAMIR AHMAD
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 185 (3) General Clause Act (X9 of 1897), Section 20 Locus Punitancy, Principle of Application Education Institution for the respondent against one of the reserved seats in the section of Medical College section of MBB. The source was admitted on merit. In view of the matter, the college administration accepted the required fee and the respondent was assigned a roll number and was asked to join the MBB Section Ist Year Class and later withdrew from the admission and got another candidate. The respondent was admitted for mistake by excusing the seat. The computer was not affirmed. Respondents cannot be deprived of their personal rights which it acquired on the basis of the Act of the Act of Authority. The principle was that of Lux Punetti, although available to the authorities under which an order was erroneously issued Can be done but such order cannot be withdrawn. Or after obtaining legal effect and having obtained some rights in favor of it, it has been recovered. After issuing the entry and roll number to any of the respondents, after approving the required dues, he has done so in his favor. The right was made, which cannot be canceled later, so the respondent was entitled to continue his education for which he was admitted by the authorities. The leave to appeal was denied in the circumstances [principle of locus ponente]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
