Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus MUHAMMAD YOUNAS

Articles 154 and 156 of the Criminal Code (CCPC) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Miscellaneous petition to withdraw or amend the order of the High Court hearing under which the investigation in this case is allegedly The complainant's complaint was moved because it contained a prescription. The FIR lodged by the police did not reflect the facts of the incident in which nine people were brutally killed and that in the district. Due to the active political influence, the Section HO was not performing its legal duties as per law, the High Court has asked the Advocate General Punjab. The Inspector General of Police has directed that if the panel provided under the Crime Branch to investigate the matter, assign or senior officers FIA Punjab Inspector General of Police, the court was named replies. The officers with whom he was ready to transfer the inquiry and selection of the department, along with his team, claimed that the High Court had either transferred the investigation to the Crime Branch or that He had nominated himself a Crime Branch officer to investigate the case. Thus, it was not correct in view of the sensational case and because of the serious nature of the case and the complaint that the accused were not brought to book. The police investigating team was required to report the progress to the court so that they too could proceed according to the law. Could fail to. As the High Court granted such officers asylum and protection of the law, the district was deemed necessary in the circumstances, therefore, controlling the investigation in this case registration advocate from Dera Murad Jamali lawyer