Find a Lawyer

MST. NAZIRAN BIBI versus MEHR GHULAM FARID, ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, MULTAN

Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10/11 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 555 Trial of the accused seeking summons for the trial was declared innocent and this time 63, was terminated under CR PC. The case was not dismissed, the accused's name was listed in the FIR and the prosecution's witnesses also included it in their statements under Section 161, CR PC, therefore, it is not necessary for the trial court. Was to first record the statements of the complainant or the prosecution's witnesses. In the FIR and the statements filed under Section 161 by the police in charge of the FIR, the accused under the CRPC was summoned to face trial in the case, the CRPC accused and his Provided the proper basis for prosecuting the accomplices of. Whether or not the accused's name is mentioned in columns 2 or 3 of this invoice, the trial court applied it using the relevant material. Before summoning the accused and his / her co-accused to stand trial, the court's mind and its ruling on the facts and circumstances of the case were neither mechanical nor wrong or wrong and were not, as such Section env does not invalidate the court process considered under AA. , The PC Petition was dropped in the corresponding range for the CR order to be canceled jobs for advocates from Manga Mandi lawyer