Find a Lawyer

ABDULLAH versus ABDUR RASHID

The original impeachment was not mentioned in any interim order by the appellate court for the filing of fresh case AXXIII, R 1 and Section 115, nor did it prove that such petition was objected but the petitioner Was not filed by the appellate court when the appellate court ordered to return the original case to file fresh case, the appellate court accepted the wrong facts, which resulted in the petitioners (defendants) appealing before the High Court. Filed District Judge's Appellate Order which was not upheld to fulfill the conclusion of justice and, based on the strange facts of the case, Peel was treated as if the revision order passed by the appellate court on the wrong assumption was set aside, the case was remanded to the first appellate court with the request of the defendants (applicants) invited. According to the law to make and decide the plaintiff's application under O XXIII, R 1, CPC jobs for fresh advocates from Ziarat lawyer