SAHIBZADA ISHAQ ZAFAR versus SARDAR MUHAMMAD ABDUL QAYYUM KHAN
Retaining the Applicant's Status for the R5 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Sections 5, 9 and 44 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A. XXXX, RR l & 2 Interim Order Applicants petitioned the High Court in December 1993 to uphold the decision of their constitutional petition and to prevent members from carrying out the duties of the Legislative Assembly and in particular their participation in the presidential election. Authority, which took place in July 1991 and subsequently an application for an interim order was filed in May 1996, the petition In this way, the payer will not suffer any loss if the defendants participated in the presidential election, irreparable harm to the defendants if they are prevented. The balance of the facility was also in favor of the respondents to continue the assembly functions as a component of the Joint Meeting and to participate in the Presidential Elections. The right to vote in the elections is the most sacred right. Or in any other electoral college, voters should be allowed to exercise their rights without fear, influence or repression if the respondents are banned from exercising their right to vote. An interim phase would be the final relief as all this court could eventually order that offices be vacated and if they were prevented from voting, such action would have allowed their offices to be vacated. Would be similar to the declaration (presidential inter
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Qazi Ahmed lawyer