Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN COAST GUARDS versus UMAR SALEYA

Article 3 Constitution of Pakistan Coast Guards Act 1973 (1973), Article 19 Torture proceedings for sanctions by a non-commercial legislative body against defendants against the defendants charged by Pakistan Coast Guards, who held a press conference. I had made serious allegations of committing robbery. The plaintiffs' officers claim that the plaintiff's establishment has been established as a legal legislative body aimed at preventing smuggling, illegal immigration and migration from the country, hostile agents or destroyers in coastal areas. To prevent infiltration and to increase the defense in wars. The defendant's alleged act has damaged the image of the plaintiff in the public eye and severely damaged the defendant's reputation, dignity and dignity for damages. There is no unwanted clergyman in the law against freedom of expression. The law recognizes the defense of justification, fair comment on the matter in the public interest and, in certain cases, about the defense of absolute or privileged liberty. There were some reservations on the right of speech, especially in relation to the conduct of public institutions and were available to an eligible qualification of Article 19 of the Constitution. The law of defamation does not have the effect of deleting where the defendant chose to remain a former party and would not have raised any of the defenses he had, whether there was any justification or public functioning There was no question to consider a fair comment. The institution or privilege designation was leveled against the plaintiff and his officers indicated that they had affected him. patent advocate from Mithi lawyer