STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN versus SH. SAJJAD HUSSAIN
Section 27 Definition of Evidence The firm of the accused filed three advertisements in the daily newspaper of 5 12 1987, 6 12 1987 and 9 12 1987, which were accused of being the Managing Director of the company in order to collect the money collected from the public. ? Mistakes and commissions, otherwise the manager of the company could not enter these advertisements and pay them with the company's funds without the consent and permission of the accused, therefore, the offense under section 27A of the Ordinance of the banking companies ? 1962 and he was convicted therefrom, the accused committed the offense within six months of entering section 27A of the Ordinance of Banking Companies 1962 and he and his manager could have been unaware of such an increase. And even though he could not escape his obligation because there was no excuse for not knowing the law, the accused was dealt with softly and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs 25,000 or three months as default. Easy prison
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer